LIFE REPORTS
![]()
![]()
![]()
\
NEW BRUNSWICK RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION
PO Box 113 Station A, Fredericton, NB E3B 4Y2
Office: 562 Brunswick St. Ph:(506)459-8990 or toll-free 1-800-796-9600
Fax: (506)454-8093. Email: nbrl@nb.sympatico.ca![]()
SEPTEMBER 2006 Editor: Peter Ryan
Your Choice, New Brunswick: Life or Death?
By Peter Ryan
"I set before you life and death .... Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live." Dt. 30:19
New Brunswick is at a crossroads. The people of this province must decide whether or not we will embrace the practice of killing our unwanted young before birth. By "embrace" I mean not just tolerating the practice but actively supporting it through our institutions and government, including paying for it through our tax dollars.
The question of destroying innocent human life has been a primordial test for humanity since the dawn of history. Thus in Gn 9 we read how God warns Noah, his sons and descendants not to shed human blood, "for in the image of God has man been made."
Historians tell us the ancient Jews stood apart from surrounding cultures by their refusal to sacrifice innocent life by such practices as abortion or infanticide. So too Christians from earliest times were set apart by their reverence toward human life and caring for the unwanted others had abandoned.
While the Judeo-Christian tradition has had its ethical failures, the concept of the inalienable dignity of every human life is one of its enduring hallmarks. That tradition shaped the whole of Western culture through the last two millennia. It has long underpinned our New Brunswick way of life.
The deep-down reason why New Brunswick has resisted pressure to publicly fund abortion on demand at private clinics is because killing our unwanted unborn has never really caught on here. Respect for life is in our bones. There’s something about what people like Henry Morgentaler are into that instinctively repels us. We know it’s very, very wrong.
But those who have no scruples about taking unborn life are out to change us. Abortion advocates believe New Brunswickers are stuck in the past, that we must be forced into modern ways. Under the guise of euphemisms like "choice" and "women’s rights" their cause has acquired a beguiling political correctness that easily intimidates some of us. So while prenatal murder - for once, let’s call it by its real name - is promoted all around us, many of us hesitate to let anyone know we are (shh!) pro-life. No one likes to be thought of as, well, not-with-it or some sort of religious nut.
Meanwhile, two developments in recent months have thrust the abortion issue upon New Brunswickers. As a result, no place in Canada is the issue so lively - or should I say, deadly - as in this province (see "Abortion’s Hot Season" article). I submit that how we as a people respond to the issue will effectively determine whether we choose life or death for us and our descendants (see biblical quote above). Around us a culture of death runs strong: in Canada as a whole, one unborn child is aborted for every three born; almost all are killed with public funds. Will we go the same way?
One development that has repeatedly captured our attention is the ongoing campaign to force our province to fund child-killing on demand at Henry Morgentaler’s private abortuary in Fredericton. Our provincial government has steadfastly resisted such pressure, and this is not expected to change over the newly elected
administration of Shawn Graham. But the pro-Morgentaler envelope is being pushed on two fronts.One is by the man himself: his lawsuit against the Province, arguing (primarily) that NB’s policy violates the Charter of Rights. Now the idea that a woman has some sort of constitutional right to kill her unborn child whenever she wishes is not only morally reprehensible but legally dubious. But who’s to say what some court might rule?
The other front is the action of the federal government. The previous government in Ottawa argued NB’s policy violates the Canada Health Act, which requires all "medically necessary" services to be publicly funded. Now the idea that not funding abortion on demand - where there’s no proof whatever of medical necessity - at private clinics outside the Medicare system somehow contravenes Medicare seems bizarre. But what is just as bizarre is that the present federal government - on record as saying it will avoid taking a stand on abortion - has adopted its predecessor’s position - one that more reflects pro-abortion ideology than either common or legal sense. So they are pressing an arbitration panel to force NB to pay for Morgentaler abortions (see article "Ottawa Poised to Take Action...").
The prospect that New Brunswick taxpayers might soon be forced to pay for the unrestricted killing of our province’s children before birth at what I call a temple of death (others call it an "abortion clinic") is worrisome enough. If we fund the murder of innocents, the blood taints all of us, we are all dragged into the culture of death.
But we have had to contend with a second major development as well: the tremendous pressure to expand abortion "access" in NB hospitals. At the end of June the Chalmers Hospital in Fredericton, which performed 400 of the 404 hospital abortions in the province in 2005, stopped ending the lives of unborn children. If only the story ended there, what a great victory for this province’s children! No more de facto abortion on demand, fraudulently billed to Medicare under the guise of "medical necessity."
But no, abortion advocates and their sympathizers pressed their demands. And the then Minister of Health - who should be guardian of the ancient and noble Hippocratic tradition whereby medicine is never involved in the taking of life - obliged by arranging for abortion "services" at two other hospitals. Why is it so hard for our government to simply choose life?
The two aforementioned hospitals are both located in the Acadian region, with its rich Catholic heritage. Abortions are virtually unknown at these hospitals - one whose former name was "House of God"!- in the past. What a corruption of a beautiful pro-life cultural heritage is now set to unfold.
The question is, what will New Brunswickers do in the face of these developments? What will we who know better do, we who know life is a sacred gift from God, we who know the preciousness of a child’s life, we who know that killing a child because he or she is unwanted mocks our Creator and is an abomination in His sight? Will we remain bystanders, shrugging our shoulders as if there is nothing we can do? Will we watch passively as our special part of God’s creation (NB) joins the culture of death so prevalent in our world?
Or will we resist? Will we dig deep and fight? Because if the lives of innocent children are not worth fighting for, what is worth fighting for?
There are many peaceful means open to citizens for influencing the course of events around them. Starting with prayer! Are we praying - and praying hard - for the respect of life, for our province to choose life? There are many other things citizens can do to influence politicians (federal and provincial), hospitals, the media in a pro-life direction. We can also assist pro-life groups and services who, usually on meagre budgets, educate young people on abortion and assist pregnant mothers. There are things we can do among our own families and friends to pass on our pro-life values.
This we must believe: through us, and people like us, New Brunswick can yet choose life! But if we do not fight for this choice, there is every danger the opposite choice will be made for us. Will the New Brunswickers of tomorrow kill their young just as others do? How we act - or do not - now will affect the answer to that question. Your choice, New Brunswick: life or death?
As Deuteronomy 30:19 reveals, one choice is a "blessing", the other "a curse". Which will we leave our descendants?
Abortion’s Hot Season In New Brunswick: A "Weather" Report
For the last few months New Brunswick has been the hottest place in Canada for the abortion issue. Here is a summary of events that have kept the temperature up.
!
[MAY] The Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, where 400 of NB’s 404 hospital abortions were performed in 2005, announces it will no longer perform abortions as of June 30. The announcement happens the same day Catholic pro-lifers are ejected from the hospital for praying a weekly rosary in the chapel over the past year.!
[JUNE, JULY] The NB Advisory Council on the Status of Women, in two opinion pieces, decries the lack of "abortion access" in the province and portrays pro-lifers as religious fanatics.!
[JUNE] Health Minister Brad Green announces he has found two physicians, at two different hospitals, to perform abortions after June 30. He refuses to identify the hospitals, citing "security concerns."!
[JUNE] The Moncton Times & Transcript calls for public funding of abortion at the Morgentaler clinic.!
[JUNE] The manager of the Morgentaler clinic in Fredericton writes an open letter to Minister Green, calling on him to start funding their private baby-killing center.!
[JUNE] The executive director of the National Abortion Federation, based in Washington DC, holds a press conference in Fredericton to berate New Brunswick for being backward in guaranteeing "abortion rights." [JULY] The Federation threatens to sue the Province.!
[JUNE] A news report says federal health minister has taken no action on the longstanding dispute with NB (initiated under the previous administration) over its refusal to fund private abortion clinics.!
[JUNE] NB Right to Life announces it has information the Dr. Georges Dumont Hospital in Moncton will start performing abortions after June 30. The hospital refuses to confirm or deny this report. A pro-life demonstration takes place at the hospital. An overwhelmingly pro-life audience attends the hospital’s annual general meeting, including Archbishop André Richard. Several pro-life submissions are made to the Trustees, including a woman who talked sorrowfully of her abortion and another who refused her doctor’s suggestion to abort.!
[JUNE] NB Right to Life executive director Peter Ryan publicly warns, if abortions go ahead at the Dumont, it will have a "genocidal" impact on the Acadian population, whose birthrate is already so low as to place Acadie’s survival in doubt. This striking prediction sets off a strong reaction in the Acadian community, including l’Acadie Nouvelle editorial decrying my "extreme language" and falsely accusing pro-lifers of condemning those for abortion "to hell." The paper prints Ryan’s rebuttal. [JUNE-JULY] Every day for several weeks letters to the editor appear in the same paper, for and against abortion.!
[JUNE] The Moncton Times & Transcript has numerous letters to the editor on abortion.!
[JUNE] A new group headed by three Acadian women holds a news conference to promote "abortion access."!
[JULY] 169 Acadian women make a public statement in favor of abortion.!
[JUNE] Two abortion activists write an open letter to the Health Minister attacking "Peter Ryan and anti-choice activists." They accuse us of making "threats," "harassing" women, having "no compassion" and opposing abortion solely on religious grounds. [JULY] Peter Ryan responds with an open letter to the minister.!
[JULY] Moncton Right to Life unveils a pro-life monument beside Assumption Cathedral, blessed by Archbishop Richard.!
[JULY] Office of New Brunswick Right to Life is vandalized twice. Windows are broken, and outdoor pro-life signs damaged. Morgentaler clinic in Fredericton is also vandalized, with anti-abortion messages spray-painted. [AUGUST]: NB Right to Life office is again vandalized, with outdoor signs stolen.!
[JULY] Two university students write an opinion piece in francophone press falsely criticizing pro-lifers for relying exclusively on religious arguments and not taking account of the social complexity of abortion.!
[JULY] An Ontario pro-life group called Show the Truth visits Fredericton, Saint John and Moncton, displaying large photos of aborted babies in public places over a period of several days. Considerable public reaction and media coverage ensues. Fredericton police report hundreds of complaints. Many are apparently concerned about protecting small children from such photos. The Show the Truth’s organizer says they post a warning at the beginning of the display, and children are less affected than people assume. Mayor Brad Woodside threatens to make such displays illegal.!
One baby is saved from abortion due to the abortion display outside the Morgentaler abortuary.!
[JULY} Police in Saint John and Moncton receive only a few complaints about Show the Truth. The Moncton Times & Transcript nevertheless supports banning the photos.! [JULY] Manager of Morgentaler clinic questions veracity of Show the Truth abortion photos. Show the Truth organizer has letter to editor authenticating photos.
!
[JULY] Opinion piece "Time to Stop Tragic Cycle Abortion Represents" by NBRL president Susan Leger and past president Beth Crouchman appears in Moncton Times & Transcript. Versions of the same article appear also in the Telegraph-Journal, and Le Moniteur.!
[JULY] Pro-abortion activists mount month-long campaign. Letters with coat-hangars (symbol of illegal abortion) to be sent to the health minister. Henry Morgentaler publishes open letter criticizing New Brunswick for "denying access to publicly-funded abortions"; he also lashes out at the "anti-choice movement."!
[AUGUST] National head of Pro-Choice Network attacks Leger-Crouchman pro-life article, in lengthy letter in Telegraph-Journal, followed by a similar attack from head of Pro-Choice NB.!
[AUGUST] "Rally for Choice" held in Fredericton. Poorly attended (30 or less), but garners big coverage in Daily Gleaner. Gleaner publishes letter from NBRL executive director asking if such coverage reflects reporting bias.! [AUGUST] Federal health minister Tony Clement says he will press ahead for an arbitration panel ruling on whether NB abortion
policy violates Canada Health Act. Peter Ryan comments Clement could end dispute by simply dropping the matter.
Beyond the Rhetoric
by Susan Leger and Elizabeth Crouchman
Editor’s Note:
The following was published in the August 7/06 Telegraph-Journal, and in the July 25thWe are troubled by much of what we have read in the province’s dailies on abortion. Some have hammered away for abortion "access." Before we decide if that’s a good idea, don’t we have to stop and think? If the question were increased access to handguns, few would be in favor. Why is ABORTION access such a good thing?
Abortion advocates want the public health system to provide, and pay for, a woman to end the life of her unwanted unborn child any time she wishes. Is that wise public policy?
In today’s cultural climate we are in danger of forgetting what abortion is. We’ve dressed it up in euphemistic language - the "right to choose." We need "the rest of the story." No reputable scientist would deny that human life begins at conception. Before a woman knows she is pregnant her baby is all there (in miniature, of course) heart beating, pumping blood through his / her tiny body. Abortion, plain and simple, is the destruction of a defenseless child in his / her mother’s womb.
Abortion proponents cry out for women’s rights to her own body…fair enough. As a woman, or as a human being for that matter, we have always understood that our rights stop the minute they infringe on the rights of another; in the case of abortion, my unborn baby. Certain groups receive public funds to advocate for women and their health issues. But their silence on the effects of abortion on women is deafening.
On the day of the abortion there is more than one death…something dies within the woman as well. Many face a daily internal battle between condemning themselves and defending their choice. Just a few symptoms of post-abortion syndrome: self-destructive behavior, lowered self esteem, bouts of crying, anger/rage, depression, suicidal urges, nightmares, flashbacks… any wonder? She has just been robbed of part of the very essence of who she is in the name of "freedom."
Let’s all do our homework. Let’s get beyond all the rhetoric.
Many people seem under the impression that New Brunswick has a legal obligation to provide for unrestricted abortion. The fact is Canada has no abortion law. The Criminal Code, the Charters of Rights, the Canada Health Act are all silent on abortion. Women may be free to obtain abortions, but there is no established legal right to do so. Therefore a province has no legal obligation to provide abortions.
Similarly, physicians and hospitals have no obligation to perform them. That is as it should be. Those who have decided to stop doing abortions are respecting medicine’s Hippocratic tradition that life should never be taken, before or after birth.
One of our prime concerns is youth, those under 25. Is abortion a healthy choice to offer them? From our experience, young people want help in making the right choices. We must give them the information that will support and promote a healthy and safe lifestyle. If there are risks or consequences to the choices they make we support and promote a healthy and safe lifestyle. If there are risks or consequences to the choices they make we must make them aware.
The voice of reason inside each of us says "do no harm." We teach children from an early age to "play fair, don't hit, don't take what is not yours, respect others..." The same principles apply to abortion.
Abortion causes real harm, and not only to a tiny human child. To imply that deliberately ending a child’s life will somehow liberate his / her mother is a tragic distortion of the facts.
What about the teenager suffering unspeakable trauma following her abortion? Her pain and regret may last a lifetime. Some young women try to dull the pain with alcohol, drugs, or other destructive methods. None of these will liberate her.
There may be two sides to every story. But there’s also the truth. In today’s climate, will our young people have ready access to that?
They need the truth about pregnancy prevention as well. That means understanding abstinence as a healthy choice. It means separating fact from rhetoric. For instance, so-called "emergency contraception" - a.k.a. the "morning-after pill" - sometimes works by ending, rather than preventing, pregnancy, expelling a newly conceived baby a few days after fertilization. It causes an early abortion. Not exactly harm-free. We are also disturbed by calls to abandon provincial requirements that hospital abortions be performed by an ob-gyn after certification by two MDs. Dropping such requirements would place women’s health in greater jeopardy.
Similarly, public funding of private clinics is the wrong way to go. Such clinics have far less safety provisions than hospitals. For instance, abortions are done with no prior MD exam, and complications are not treated on-site (they are sent to hospitals). That hardly seems safe.
For the good of our province, women, and future generations, we believe it is time for everyone to act responsibly on this issue. Let us strive to "do no harm." Let us use our energies to build a welcoming and safe environment for all, born and unborn.
Why not start by redoubling efforts to help pregnant women? Government funding for the private centers offering counseling, support, life-giving programs, and healing for the broken could enable these agencies to expand services and reach more women in need.
Let us all take this opportunity to stop the tragic cycle of abuse and violence which abortion represents. Let it be said that the people of New Brunswick truly care for and respect all.
Susan Leger is the president of the New Brunswick Right to Life Association. Elizabeth Crouchman, RN, is past president.

Culture of Life Monument Unveiled. Moncton Right to Life unveiled its Culture of Life monument on July 1. The monument is located beside Our Lady of the Assumption Cathedral on St. George St. The monument was blessed by Archbishop André Richard, csc. Pictured above left to right: Maurice Arsenault, Moncton RTL president; Richard Doucette, State Deputy of the NB Knights of Columbus who supported the project; Archbishop Richard; NBRL executive director Peter Ryan. The front of the monument says, "All Life is Sacred" and shows images of an unborn child, handicapped person and elderly couple. The back reads, "In memory of God’s loved unborn victims."
Premium Quality, Classic Religious Art
Christmas Cards
$7.50 per pkg. of 10/ $20 per 3 pks. ! Various beautiful designs ! Bulk orders available too
Call NB Right to Life toll-free 1-888-796-9600. Help support the pro-life cause.
Ottawa Poised to Take Action on NB Abortion Policy
From Bobby-Jean McKinnon, "Federal Health Minister Says Ottawa Will Wait Till After N.B. Vote to Address Access to Abortions," Telegraph-Journal August 22, 2006. Reprinted with permission.
CHARLOTTETOWN -
New Brunswickers will have to wait a while longer to find out what, if anything, the federal government plans to do to improve access to abortions in the province, says the federal health minister.Editor’s Note: The reported 12-week cutoff for NB abortions is erroneous. No limit exists for Medicare-funded abortions.
The 2006 Provincial Conference and Annual General Meeting
The New Brunswick Right to Life Association
Saturday, October 21, 2006
Wesleyan Church, 45 Chapman Road, Sussex
AGENDA
8:30 a.m. Registration & Reception (coffee, juice, muffins, donuts) Please visit our Display!
9:00a.m.Welcome - Kelly & Lauren Peters, Co-Presidnts,
Sussex Area Right to Life (host chapter)
- Susan Leger, President, NB Right to Life
9:15 a.m. President’s Report for 2005-2006 Susan Leger
9:30 a.m. Executive Director’s Report for 2005-2006 Peter Ryan
9:45 a.m. Questions and Discussion Susan Leger, Peter Ryan
10:00 a.m. Helping Women to Choose Life Tanya McRae, Director, Sussex Crisis Pregnancy Centre
10:30 a.m. "Defending the Pro-Life View on Abortion: Stephanie Gray
Adding Persuasion to Your Passion"
11:45 a.m. Invitation to Silent Auction Sandra Hayes
12:00 p.m. Lunch (provided)
Luncheon Talk: "This One Will Live" Pastor Roger Smith, Sussex
1:30 "Making Abortion Unthinkable: How the Pro-Life Stephanie Gray
Movement Can Triumph"
2:30 p.m. -Silent Auction Results
-Break
3:00 p.m. ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING (open to conference registrants)
-
Minutes of 2005 AGM4:45 p.m. Closing Prayer
Young Pro-Life Speaker Knows How to Hold Her Own
Editor’s Note: Stephanie Gray, special guest at the upcoming NB Right to Life 2006 provincial conference, is no stranger to public debate. Following is a tale of one such instance.
LONDON, March 27, 2006 - One year after the University of Western Ontario (UWO) awarded infamous abortionist Henry Morgentaler an honorary degree, the abortion debate has re-ignited.
On March 21, Stephanie Gray, Executive Director of the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform, spoke against abortion at King's College at UWO. Police and security were brought to the scene to handle expected disruption from abortion advocates. 130 people attended the talk, about half were vehemently against Gray. Several spoke out of turn throughout the presentation. One student was so disruptive security told him to leave. He refused but remained silent for the remainder of the presentation.
Gray was protected that evening by an undercover police officer. Before the presentation started, she was given a security briefing which included having a uniformed police officer in the next room, ready to whisk her to a police car if violence broke out.
That evacuation plan was required since many of the abortion supporters were unruly. "Their intolerance was appalling," said Gray. "In my four years of giving presentations and debates at university campuses across North America I have never encountered such a rude and disruptive audience. Abortion supporters 'talk' tolerance but these ones sure don't 'walk' it."
Throughout the presentation, random audience members stood up and faced their backs to Gray. Others placed pieces of tape on their mouths with "choice" written on them.
The crowd became greatly agitated when Gray spoke about personhood. She explained that denying the unborn their status as persons was analogous to past atrocities when societies denied for example Jews their personhood. She pointed out that the reason abortion supporters despise the comparison was their denial of the value of the unborn. "And that is exactly the issue," said Gray, "Are the unborn human beings like born people or aren't they?"
A female student was critical of Gray's reliance on science to prove the unborn are human saying, "Science has been wrong before." When Gray asked the young woman for an alternative scientific explanation she did not offer one. Gray explained that when human sperm and egg unite, a whole, living, human being comes into existence, one that has the genetic material needed to inform and organize its growth. She referred to Moore and Persaud's embryology textbook, "Before We Are Born," used by medical students at the University of British Columbia, which says, "Human development begins at fertilization."
A pro-abortion medical researcher also claimed the science cited by Gray was wrong. He said that the unborn become independent beings at birth. Gray's responded that the issue was not when someone becomes independent, but instead when one becomes human. She said that after fertilization the unborn get bigger, become more developed, change their environment, and become increasingly independent-changes that people go through post-birth as well-but that their human nature remains consistent.
One young woman said that preventing abortion would force women to have children. That assumes, however, countered Gray, that a pregnant woman doesn't already have a child. "But that's the issue," said Gray, "does she?"
Another student told Gray that the time and money pro-lifers put into their campaigns should be directed to alleviating poverty. Gray retorted with an analogy saying that people don't criticize the cancer society for not addressing AIDS, because they recognize both as legitimate causes. "So," Gray asked, "Is a pro-life campaign a legitimate cause like a program to help born people? Well, are the unborn human like born people? That's the issue."
During the question and answer period, a male student shouted at Gray, "You're insane!" Gray responded by thanking the student: "By calling me insane you're showing me that my arguments are so good you are unable to refute them; instead, you resort to attacking what you perceive my character to be."
Another student complained, "This isn't a debate!" Gray responded that she was willing to debate but many abortion supporters declined the opportunity. In fact, Henry Morgentaler was recently asked to debate Gray at McMaster University in Hamilton. His assistant declined on his behalf.
Following the talk, pro-life organizers handed out cookies to attendees. Pro-abortion students were taken aback at the kind gesture. The host's outreach and Gray's composure showed the abortion supporters that pro-lifers are respectful and kind even when abortion supporters treat them with hostility.
Breakthrough at UNB
For the past two years some pro-life students at UNB-Fredericton have been working to establish a pro-life club. On Sept. 11, 2006 UNB Life-Link received official approval from the Student Council. Following is an account of how this turn of events occurred, by the group’s leader Rose Savidge.
"We received status this evening! Status that enables us to receive funding from UNB! That is, "ratified status." Megan S. and I went together to the Council meeting. Seven other groups were promptly ratified, one tabled, and there ensued a 40 minute discussion about the status of UNB Life-Link.
"After some deliberation and a near motion to table, the Council called upon Megan and I to speak and answer their questions. We did so, and there followed more discussion in which the council came to re-examine their role as Council. It was quite intense, but thanks to the per-sistent questions of one of the Council members and after scrutiny of the Council's Policies, it was decided that we had either to receive full status - as they acknowledged our lack of political or religious affiliation - or no status at all.
"A motion to ratify was then made and passed. When the Council voted there were only two young women who voted against our ratification. As the entire council was present, we received the votes of an overwhelming majority. Phewww, what an evening. Praise and thanksgiving to God!"
UNB Life-Link participated in the UNB Clubs & Societies fair Sept. 14. The group was also featured in the Sept. 20 edition of the student paper The Brunswickan.
New Brunswick Right to Life invites you to aSpecial Guest Speaker: Stephanie Gray
! Other speakers ! Entertainment
Spreading the Message at McMaster University
by Theresa Matters. Abridged from The Interim September 2006. Reprinted with permission.
McMaster LifeLine is a campus club that began in October 2004. The current president and vice-president are Johanna Miller and Elaine Zettel, respectively. They, along with other enthusiastic pro-life students, started the club. What has followed has been a spectacular group that has brought life issues to the forefront at the McMaster campus community.
They have built up their club membership through bi-weekly apologetics training meetings, along with having information tables in the student center. They have hosted speakers, such as Rebecca Kiessling on her story as a child of rape, Dr. Clem Persaud on stem cells, Dr. Deborah Zeni on abortion and women’s health and Nathalie Hudson on euthanasia. A debate was organized with Stephanie Gray from the Canadian Centre for Bioethical Reform against the Debate Society. Closing up the latest term, the club had a memorial for the unborn.
A major accomplishment for LifeLine was on March 14, 2006 when it had an Unmasking Choice Campaign (UCC). The UCC display is a one-day event consisting of four large graphic photos depicting aborted babies. These photos were displayed in the center of campus. Members of LifeLine stood by the signs and engaged passersby in discussion, questioning their understanding of the word "choice." The also handed out over 1,600 pamphlets explaining pro-life arguments. (See lifesite.net’s daily news for March 15, 2006 for full details).
Members of LifeLine have also been working on their presentation skills in order to present the life messages to high schools. They routinely present what is known as Pro-Life 101 at local high schools, pro-life youth conferences, and church events.
It was the efforts of LifeLine that allowed 54 university students to travel together to attend the ninth annual national March for Life in Ottawa last May. There was a session at the march for university students the following day. Led by the National Campus Life Network (NCLN), this was the first year of having a separate university forum. It proved to be very beneficial, as leaders from campuses across Canada were able to share experiences and network.
When asked what is the hardest obstacle to promoting the life message throughout a campus, Miller responded: "Keeping out posters up, stopping the spread of untruths about our mission and moral relativism." Zettel added, "We are overcoming these obstacles by our persistence and dedication …. because we’ve done so many events and been so visible, people are beginning to take sides. They respect us and are engaging in the discussion, even if they don’t agree with us."
Miller’s advice to other pro-life students and clubs is to "remain convicted." Also very important is: "Know the rules for clubs and abide by them, but do not allow yourselves to be lied to or mistreated by administration." Without a doubt, Zettel affirms that "it is essential to learn apologetics and be confident in our position as we introduce our generation to pro-life." For any clubs that may be struggling, trying new ideas and approaches could be the solution. A good resource is NCLN (ncln.ca) to get connected with other pro-life students across Canada. Zettel remains motivated by stories from women who have had abortions and suffered from them, pictures of aborted babies and other students who work together to expose the truth about life issues. Miller loves seeing the look in people’s eyes with they come to look at fetal models and literature on information tables. As well, the knowledge that she and others are planting seeds, and that truth does change minds, allows Miller to fight for the vulnerable.
McMaster LifeLine is just one of many campus clubs that are creating a culture of life among their peers. Its members are convinced that this is the human rights movement of the 21st Century and they are ready to see an end to the denigration of human life. Students across Canada are rising to the challenge of presenting the truth with a refreshing passion that motivates them to remain convicted and active.For more information on McMaster LifeLine, visit it online at www.mcmaster-lifeline.com.
NB Life Chains Held

Several hundred New Brunswickers particpated in Life Chains on October 1. The international event held across North America involves a silent public witness to God’s love for unborn children and their mothers. Life Chains were held in Fredericton, Dieppe, St. Stephen and Edmundston.
Who’s Telling the Truth?
Authenticity of Abortion Photos Questioned
The authenticity of the abortion photos publicly displayed in Fredericton this July was questioned by Simone Leibovitch, manager of the Morgentaler clinic. Below are her comments, followed by the response of the Show the Truth pro-life group that displayed the images.THE OBJECTION
"People holding these signs of these horrible graphic images that they say are a 10-week fetus. It's not true ..."
She said she works at the abortion clinic and she has never seen what the group publicly displayed in its images.
"When you look on their website, they say that they found this - they call them babies - behind some 'abortuary' in the United States whenever, I don’t know when," she said.
"I think it's important for people to know that, first of all, that the Morgentaler Clinic deals in a
very professional manner. Also, in the elimination of biomedical hazards, they don’t go in garbage cans or jars or dumpsters. They go to the hospital to be disposed of."
People need to understand that, Leibovitch said.
"I think it's really important for people to understand that these graphic images are erroneous. That they are not true, but, you know, they stay with you," she said. "Unfortunately, that image and abortion are linked together in peoples' minds."
- Simone Leibovitch, quoted in Heather McLaughlin, "Vandals Strike Morgentaler Clinic", Daily Gleaner July 29, 2006
THE RESPONSE
"The Centre for Bio-ethical Reform, the organization from whom we obtained this abortion
image, verifies its authenticity with a pathologist’s report which has been independently corroborated by Dr. Anthony P. Levatino, M.D., J.D. a physician and attorney, stating the following:
I, the undersigned, having performed induced abortions earlier in my career, have examined the photos depicting the aborted human embryos and fetuses used by the Centre for Bio-ethical Reform in their public education projects. It is my professional opinion that the photos depict aborted human embryos and fetuses and that the depicted aborted human embryos and fetuses are accurately captioned as to age, in weeks since fertilization."
"Medical textbooks, 4D ultrasound, and thousands of websites confirm the child’s
development at ten weeks. The fetus’ heart has
been beating for seven weeks, brain waves have been present for two weeks, arms and legs are formed and fingerprints are visible." For moredetails see: http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/wwwhuman/Stages/Stages.htm
"It is understandable why those who work in the abortion industry do not want people to see what an aborted child actually looks like. Once they do, that image and abortion are linked in people’s minds, as Ms. Leibovitch rightfully says. And that would obviously be bad for business."
- Rosemary Connell, Coordinator, Show the Truth,
Letter to Editor, Daily Gleaner August 5, 2006
Editor’s Note: There was no follow-up rebuttal by Ms. Leibovitch.
Teens Cope With Unwanted Pregnancies Better Than
Abortions, Study Shows
by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor August 11, 2006
. Reprinted with Permission.Bowling Green, OH (LifeNews.com) -- A new study published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence refutes a long-standing contention that teenagers are better able to handle an abortion than dealing with an unplanned pregnancy. The study finds that adolescent girls who have an abortion are five times more likely to seek help for psychological and emotional problems than those who keep their baby.
Dr. Priscilla Coleman, a research psychologist at Bowling Green State University, led the study.
Coleman also found that teenagers who have abortions instead of carrying the pregnancy to term were also over three times more likely to report subsequent trouble sleeping, and nine times more likely to report subsequent marijuana use.
To factor out other reasons that may have prompted the need for psychological help, sleep difficulties or drug use, Coleman examined 17 other variables such as prior mental health history and family factors. That helped narrow down the study to make sure it focused only on the results after the abortion or birth decision.
Data for the study came from a federally-funded longitudinal study of adolescents from throughout the U.S. who participated in two series of interviews in 1995 and 1996.
About 76 percent of girls who had abortions and 80 percent of girls who gave birth were between the ages of 15 and 19 during the survey and the rest were younger teenagers.
Previous studies have found that younger abortion patients may be more likely to experience difficulties coping after abortion compared to older women. That may be because they are more likely to be pressured into unwanted abortions or to undergo abortions later in the pregnancy, leading to more physical and emotional risk.
A 2004 survey of American and Russian women published in the Medical Science Monitor found that 64 percent of American women reported that they felt pressured into abortion.
Coleman said that for teens, the pressure probably comes from the fact that they are more likely to be perceived as unready to be parents and that abortion is often seen by those around them as the best solution.
"When women feel forced into abortion by others or by life circumstances, negative post-abortion outcomes become more common," she wrote. "Adolescents are generally much less prepared to assume the responsibility of parenthood and are logically the recipients of pressure to abort."
Coleman pointed out that, while having a child as a teen may be problematic, "the risks of terminating seem to be even more pronounced."
"The scientific evidence is now strong and compelling," Coleman said. "Abortion poses more risks to women than giving birth."
In a statement LifeNews.com obtained, Dr. David Reardon, the director of the Elliot Institute, said that Coleman's study was particularly important because it examines pregnancy "wantedness."
"Over the last six years, numerous studies have conclusively linked higher rates of mental illness and behavioral problems associated with abortion compared to childbirth," Reardon, who has contributed to more than a dozen studies examining psychological outcomes after abortion, said.
"But abortion advocates have generally dismissed these findings, insisting that while women who abort may fare worse than women who give birth to planned children, they may fare better than the important subgroup of women who carry unintended pregnancies to term," Reardon explained.
"Coleman's study addresses this argument and shows that the facts don't support abortion advocates' speculations."
The results of the study are also important because about one-fourth of the abortions that take place annually in the United States are done on teenagers, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a Planned Parenthood affiliate.
As such, the study shows that teenagers should be advised to not have an abortion in order to avoid both short and long-term emotional and psychological complications.
Source: Priscilla K. Coleman, "Resolution of Unwanted Pregnancy During Adolescence Through Abortion Versus Childbirth: Individual and Family Predictors and Psychological Consequences," Journal of Youth and Adolescence (2006).